

Peter Cvjetanovic marches with white nationalists and far right extremists as they encircle the base of a Thomas Jefferson statue after marching through the University of Virginia campus with torches in Charlottesville, Va., Aug. 11, 2017.
Samuel Corum/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
Today is the five-year anniversary of the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlotteville, Virginia. I watched the terrifying event on television, and it shocked me. Here were normal-looking white, college-age men marching through Charlottesville, Va. Chanting “Jews shall not replace us.” I am Jewish. My daughter and son-in-law attended the University of Virginia. Charlottesville has a special place in my heart. What brought us to this place where neo-Nazis were marching through an iconic city in Virginia shouting antisemitic slogans and what did those slogans mean?[i]
This was my first exposure to “The Great Replacement Theory.” This idea has its origins in French antisemitism, specifically in the writings of Jean Raspail and Renaud Camus. According to Wikipedia, “Camus (not to be confused with the Nobel Laureate Albert Camus) is a French novelist, conspiracy theorist and white nationalist, and the inventor of the “Great Replacement“, a far-right conspiracy theory that claims that a ‘global elite’ is colluding against the white population of Europe to replace them with non-European peoples.” Camus writes of “replacement elites” who are driving this process.
The important word here is “colluding.” It is a demographic fact that non-white populations are growing faster in Europe and North America than are white populations, although the exact numbers are in dispute. In Europe, in general, and in France, in particular, for “non-white” read “Muslim.” According to the Pew Research Center, Muslims made up 4.9% of Europe’s population in 2016 (and 8.8% of France’s population). By 2050, that proportion could grow to 14.0%. Clearly, some people could see those numbers as threatening. But what’s important is not the influx of Muslim immigrants, caused largely by violence in Syria and other parts of the Middle East, but the idea that this result is part of a conscious plot.
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, “The great replacement narrative provides the central framework for the global white supremacist movement. The racist conspiracy says there is a systematic, global effort to replace white, European people with nonwhite, foreign populations. The ultimate goal of those responsible — Democrats, leftists, “multiculturalists” and, at times, Jews — is to reduce white political power and, ultimately, to eradicate the white race. The theory has motivated multiple terror attacks, including the 2018 attack at the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Tree of Life Synagogue, the 2019 attacks at two Christchurch, New Zealand, mosques and an El Paso, Texas, Walmart, and, most recently, an attack targeting Black people at a supermarket in Buffalo, New York.”
This conspiracy theory would have probably died in the dark corners of the French-language internet if it hadn’t been revived by Tucker Carlson. Let’s trace how the Great Replacement became mainstream in America and how it has been used to trigger mass shootings in Pittsburg where 11 congregants of a Jewish Temple were killed, Christchurch New Zealand where 51 people were killed in attacks on mosques, El Paso, Texas, where 23 people were killed in an attack on a Walmart, and in Buffalo, NY where 10 African Americans were shot in an attack on a grocery store. Each of the shooters had pieced together a manifesto citing that they were acting to protect the white race from replacement.
According to The National Immigration Forum, “In mid-September 2021, the U.S. media turned its attention to an increasing number of Haitian migrants seeking protection at the border in Del Rio, Texas. While most of the arriving migrants were either turned back into Mexico or deported to destitute conditions in Haiti, some Haitian families were allowed to stay in the U.S. and pursue asylum claims in immigration court. On Sept. 22, cable television host Tucker Carlson provided his own theory as to what was happening at the border. In a segment titled “Nothing About What’s Happening Is an Accident,” Carlson said that current U.S. border policy is designed to ‘change the racial mix of the country. … In political terms this policy is called the ‘great replacement,’ the replacement of legacy Americans with more obedient people from faraway countries.” Carlson concluded that President Biden’s policies with regard to the Haitian migrants have put the U.S. on a “suicidal” path.”
Note several pieces to Carlson’s syllogism here:
- Non-white populations are growing faster than white populations. This is true. By 2045, white, non-Hispanics will become the minority in America according to the US Census Bureau (see chart below)
- Democratic politicians are actively seeking to increase immigration from Latin America in order to gain future voters. Carlson argues that Democrats want open borders. “Demographic change is the key to the Democratic Party’s political ambitions. Let’s say that again for emphasis, because it is the secret to the entire immigration debate: Demographic change is the key to the Democratic Party’s political ambitions. In order to win and maintain power. Democrats plan to change the population of the country. They’re no longer trying to win you over with their program. They’re obviously not trying to improve your life. They don’t even really care about your vote anymore. Their goal is to make you irrelevant.”
- Immigrants not only threaten our jobs, they also are dirty and bring litter (this was a major point of Carlson’s broadcasts of December 13, 2018, and several weeks following).

There is no evidence for any of this. Democrats do call for reforming a broken immigration system. These reforms would include:
- Finding a path to citizenship for Dreamers
- Eliminating the Draconian policies of the Trump Administration
- Having a logical and generous asylum system
- Linking work visas to labor force needs (particularly in high tech fields)
- Providing short-term work visas for seasonal workers like farm workers who are needed by American agriculture
- Unite families when possible
Carlson turned his anti-immigration stance into a campaign, and it certainly sounded like “replacement theory.” In fact, a study by The New York Times found more than 400 episodes over five years in which Carlson generally espoused the slogan “they want to replace you.” The “they” is apparently Democratic politicians; the “you” they want to replace are “white Americans,” and the replacers are immigrants, mostly from Latin America (and Haiti).
The results were predictable. A few disturbed people saw this theory as the reason their lives were not what they hoped they would be. The most recent example is Payton Brendon Gendron who drove more than 200 miles from his home in Conklin, N.Y. to a predominantly black part of Buffalo where authorities say he fired approximately 60 shots at shoppers and workers, killing ten of them. His writings give some idea as to what drove him to kill black people. They included “statements that his motivation for the attack was to prevent Black people from replacing white people and eliminating the white race, and to inspire others to commit similar racially-motivated attacks.”
His manifesto begins: “If there’s one thing I want you to get from these writings, it’s that White birth rates must change. Everyday the White population becomes fewer in number. To maintain a population the people must achieve a birth rate that reaches replacement fertility levels, in the western world that is about 2.06 births per woman.” The “Manifesto” goes on for 180 pages. He writes, “Mass immigration will disenfranchise us, subvert our nations, destroy our communities, destroy our ethnic ties, destroy our cultures, destroy our peoples. Long before low fertility levels ever could (sic). Thus, before we deal with the fertility rates, we must deal with both the invaders within our lands and the invaders that seek to enter our lands. We must crush immigration and deport those invaders already living on our soil. It is not just a matter of our prosperity, but the very survival of our people.”
Much of his manifesto is in a Q&A format and shows him to be very self-aware. For example.
Q: Why did you decide to carry out the attack?
A: 1) To show to the replacers that as long as the White man lives, our land will never be theirs and they will never be safe from us; 2) To directly reduce immigration rates to European lands by intimidating and physically removing the replacers themselves; 3) To intimidate the replacers already living on our lands to emigrate back to their home countries; and so on. He claims he got his ideas from the internet and is following in the steps of Brenton Tarrant. Tarrant was the Australian white supremacist who killed 51 worshippers in a March 2019 attack on two mosques in New Zealand.
He never explains why, if immigrants are the enemy, he mostly killed native blacks (unlike Tarrant). He says of himself that he is a fascist, a racist, a white supremacist, and an antisemite. Much of his screed is centered on antisemitism. He is predominantly a separationist as the following Q and A shows.
Q: Did, or do you personally hate blacks?
A: A black man or woman living in their homelands? No.
A black man or woman choosing to invade our lands, live on our soil, live on government support and attack and replace our people? Yes, I dislike them. (Here he ignores the fact that most blacks in America are descendants of slaves and didn’t come here out of their own volition).
The Southern Poverty Law Center conducted a poll on extremism and found, “that the ideas underpinning the white nationalist “great replacement” narrative recently cited by an alleged white supremacist terrorist in Buffalo, New York, have become thoroughly mainstream on the political right. Nearly 7 in 10 Republicans surveyed agree to at least some extent that demographic changes in the United States are deliberately driven by liberal and progressive politicians attempting to gain political power by “replacing more conservative white voters.”
Summary. The “Great Replacement Theory” has its origins in French antisemitism though going back to the late 18th century.The main idea is that there are groups of people (Jews, primarily, but also other elites) colluding to replace white European culture as the predominant culture in Europe and the rest of the Western world.Tucker Carlson is the most prominent voice and face of the idea, although many internet sites espouse the same, or worse views. Some disturbed individuals in America and elsewhere have decided take the next step and resort to violence against the replacers.
[i] The International Remembering the Holocaust Alliance insists that the correct spelling for “antisemitic” does not include a dash (“anti-semitic”) because such a spelling implies that there is something called “Semitism” “which not only legitimizes a form of pseudo-scientific racial classification that was thoroughly discredited by association with Nazi ideology, but also divides the term, stripping it from its meaning of opposition and hatred toward Jews”